What Is Authorship Confirmation Statement

What Is Authorship Confirmation Statement

• As an employee in the Medline/PubMed folder of the article; • As authors in a group author statement at the end of the article on thebmj.com; and • As a contributor to the contribution statement at the end of the article on thebmj.com. At BMJ, we want authors to assure us that all authors included in an article meet the authorship criteria. In addition, we want to be sure that there is no one else who meets the criteria but has not been accepted as an author. Many journals request a statement in which the individual contributions of the authors are mentioned in a multi-author article. While some journals provide a form or template for this purpose, others leave it open to authors. You can search online for a contributor template provided by another journal. This gives you a pretty good idea of what you should cover. Here is such a template that you can consult. The BMJ requires that all individuals appointed as authors meet the four ICMJE criteria for authorship, and anyone who meets all four criteria must be identified as an author. We only recognize natural persons as authors. These authorship criteria are intended to reserve the status of author to those who deserve to be recognized and can assume responsibility for the work. The criteria are not intended to exclude from paternity colleagues who otherwise meet the paternity criteria by denying them the opportunity to fulfil criterion #s 2 or 3.

Therefore, all individuals who meet the first criterion should have the opportunity to participate in the review, draft and final approval of the manuscript. Nature Portfolio journals promote transparency through the publication of authors` contributions statements. Authors are required to include a statement of responsibility in the manuscript, including journal-type articles that specify each author`s contribution. The level of detail varies; Some disciplines produce manuscripts that involve discrete efforts that are easily articulated in detail, while other areas function as group efforts at all stages. The authors` contributions are included in the published work. This Nature editorial describes the guideline in more detail. 2. What appeared in an author`s statement at the end of the article: The International Committee of Medical Journal Publishers Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (ICMJE Recommendations 2018) recommends that authorship be based on the following four criteria: Nature Portfolio journals also allow a group of co-authors to have contributed equally to the work, and a group of co-authors who co-supervised the work together. Other equivalent contributions are best described in the author`s contribution statements. The corresponding authors have specific responsibilities (described above). Here is a research article in The BMJ with the authorship of the group, as it appeared on Medline, with all staff clearly listed as individuals: The journal requires me to make a “Contribution to Paternity” statement when I submit my work.

But the Journal`s website offers no template or guidance on how to do this. What must I do? How can I ensure that the copyright contribution statement I have created complies with the necessary guidelines? Word restrictions do NOT apply to abstracts, disclosure statements, author contribution statements, funding information, acknowledgements, tables, illustration captions, or references. Nature Portfolio journals encourage collaboration with colleagues in locations where research is conducted and expect them to be included as co-authors if they meet all of the authorship criteria described above. Contributors who do not meet all the authorship criteria should be listed in the Acknowledgements section. Contributors and safeguards are concepts that were first applied to original research papers and are sometimes difficult to define for other articles. Each contribution statement should clearly state who contributed what to the planning, execution and reporting of the work described in the article, and should identify one or sometimes more contributors as responsible for the overall content as guarantors. For BMJ articles that do not report original research – such as editorials, clinical journals, education and debate – please indicate who came up with the idea for the article, who reviewed the literature, who wrote the article and who is the guarantor (the contributor who assumes full responsibility for the finished article, had access to all data, and controlled the decision to publish). For non-research related articles that include case reports such as weekly lessons, drug updates, and interactive case reports, please also indicate who identified and/or managed the cases. Editors and reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality of manuscripts during the peer review process.

The total or partial distribution of a manuscript outside the framework necessary for evaluation is prohibited before the official date of publication of an accepted manuscript. Reviewers are not allowed to contact authors directly. Nature encourages authors of articles to say who did what. Nature. Authors` contributions, 3 June 1999. The BMJ lists contributors in two ways. First, we publish a list of author names at the beginning of the article, and second, we list the contributors (some of whom may not be listed as authors) at the end of the article and provide details about who did what in the planning, execution, and reporting of the work. It is a good place to include contributions from patients or members of the public who have helped as volunteer research staff and who provide their specific names and roles. We encourage authors to fully recognize the contribution of patients and the public to their research, where appropriate. All peer-reviewed submissions that include animal testing must comply with local and national regulatory principles and include a statement in the “Materials and Methods” section of the main text indicating whether national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals have been followed. Any changes made to the list of authors after submission, such as . B a change in the order of authors or the deletion or addition of authors, must be approved by each author.

Editors of Nature Portfolio journals are unable to investigate or resolve disputes between authors before or after publication. Such disagreements, where they cannot be resolved between the authors, should be addressed to the competent institutional authority. Vast institute. CRISPR timeline. Available from www.broadinstitute.org/what-broad/areas-focus/project-spotlight/crispr-timeline Last accessed July 6, 2020. Note that the names of all co-authors must be written for the last point. Once you have written the declaration of contribution, make sure that it is signed by all co-authors before submitting it to the journal. You will also find this e-book useful: A practical manual with templates for communicating with the journal We know that authors might fear that their work will not be properly recognized if they form a group, but this is unfounded. Medline`s guidelines can address group authorship while giving due credit to each individual: when reporting on research using human data, authors should indicate whether the procedures used have been evaluated by the appropriate institutional and national review committee. If no formal ethics committee is available; Authors must indicate whether the research was completed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

If there is any doubt as to whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, authors must explain the reasons for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the questionable aspects of the study. Approval by a competent review committee does not preclude editors from forming their own opinion as to whether the conduct of the research was appropriate. If the study is found to be excluded from the review, a statement from the committee is required. The informed consent of participants should always be ensured. If this is not possible, an institutional review body must decide whether it is ethically justifiable. This information must be set out in the cover letter accompanying the submission and a sentence declaring compliance must be included in the “Materials and Methods” section of the main text. If an error is discovered after the publication of an article, the corresponding author must submit the correction in writing to the editors of the journal for review. .